OIG Attorney Investigator Rachel Reddick explores the growing tension in the investigative process between AI-drafted workplace allegations and the investigator’s responsibility to assess the credibility of parties to a matter. When evaluating such cases, investigators must keep a disciplined focus to separate the framing that may occur in AI-assisted complaints and their own independent assessment of the supporting evidence. While a well-written complaint may include all of the legal buzzwords applicable to workplace misconduct, it is important to determine if the underlying factual narrative exists independently of that language.

To read the full article, please visit “Stay Neutral with AI-Drafted Workplace Allegations” on the SHRM website.